ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close

cloudant: All content tagged as cloudant in NoSQL databases and polyglot persistence

From IBM to… IBM: The short, but complicated history of CouchDB, Cloudant, and a lot of other companies and projects

Damien Katz created CouchDB after working at IBM on Lotus Notes: CouchDB and Me. CouchDB went the Apache way. Then things got complicated…

On the West coast, Damien Katz and a team of committers created Couchio, later renamed to CouchOne, later merged with Membase to become Couchbase, which finally dropped CouchDB. Damien Katz left Couchbase.

A confusing history with a very complicated genealogy of projects (don’t worry, this goes on) and companies. And this was only West Coast.

East Coast, Cloudant took CouchDB and made it BigCouch. I thought that Cloudant will be the CouchDB company — and in a way it was. Cloudant put BigCouch on the cloud as a service and on GitHub as open source. BigCouch is supposed to get back into Apache CouchDB, but many months later this hasn’t materialized yet.

To complete the circle, today IBM announced signing an agreement to acquire Cloudant — news coverage on GigaOm, BostInno, TechCrunch. Which probably makes sense considering Cloudant’s relationship with SoftLayer and IBM’s $1 billion Platform-as-a-Service Investment, but less so if you consider the IBM and 10genMongoDB collaboration.

Anyways, the future of Apache CouchDB is bright. Yep.

Original title and link: From IBM to… IBM: The short, but complicated history of CouchDB, Cloudant, and a lot of other companies and projects (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)


Welcome BigCouch to CouchDB

Wait! BigCouch was actually merged in CouchDB:

What does this mean? Well, right now, the code is merged, but not released. So hold your clicks just a moment! Once the code has been tested, we will include it in one of our regular releases.

Original title and link: Welcome BigCouch to CouchDB (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: https://blogs.apache.org/couchdb/entry/welcome_bigcouch


Cloudant's BigCouch and Apache CouchDB... the merge that took a while

The two merged thousands of lines of Erlang to update Apache CouchDB with the modifications Cloudant has made to its core database software. These changes lay the groundwork for preparing the Apache community to improve CouchDB performance at large scale.

I don’t remember when was the first time I’ve heard about BigCouch being contributed to the Apache CouchDB project. I do remember though that, at that time, I actually believed it, as it made sense: Cloudant was still in its early days, seeking validation of its solution, and CouchDB was at its peak.

It’s been so long that I totally forgot about it. But now I’m starting to believe it again. Just as much as a GitHub branch.

Original title and link: Cloudant’s BigCouch and Apache CouchDB… the merge that took a while (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: https://cloudant.com/blog/update-from-nebraska-the-cloudant-couchdb-merger/


Cloudant's phenomenal response time

James Mundy writing about using Cloudant from his app deployed on Microsoft Azure cloud:

When I began implementing Cloudant’s CouchDB based distributed database as a service (daas) to replace our NoSQL Azure Table solution I had some reservations about the time making calls from our Azure Web Roles to their separate data centre would add to response times.

Turns out that really wasn’t anything to worry about at all.

This is very interesting (even if James’s experiment is not really a benchmark). I assume that the way Cloudant pulls this is by offering their service only from top notch connected datacenters. That on top of making sure the service is correctly tuned.

Original title and link: Cloudant’s phenomenal response time (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://mendez.quora.com/Cloudants-phenomenal-response-time?srid=3nu1&share=1


The Business of Database as a Service

From a PR announcement about Cloudant’s business results in 2012 :

Cloudant says that during 2012, a year that saw its staff grow to 45 employees, the company’s customer base grew to more than 12,000 multi-tenant customers, counting both free customers, as well as the 50 that pay for its dedicated clusters.

I wholeheartedly hope these results are not indicative for the Database-as-a-Service market. I also wish Cloudant an even better 2013.

I haven’t seen any numbers from major platforms like Amazon Web Services, Heroku, or Rackspace, so if you have any please do share them.

Original title and link: The Business of Database as a Service (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)


CouchDB: A Season Finale

There was a story earlier this year that I, as someone that has spent an enormous amount of time contributing to open source projects, thought it was no story. Considering how much was published about it, chances were you already read something about Damien Katz’s The future of CouchDB.

At the time of that post, my draft looked like this:

And now I, and the Couchbase team, are mostly moving on. It’s not that we think CouchDB isn’t awesome. It’s that we are creating the successor to it: Couchbase Server. A product and project with similar capabilities and goals, but more faster, more scalable, more customer and developer focused. And definitely not part of Apache.

Elvis has left the building. Please welcome The Beatles!

I always thought that some sort of a message from the its creator was needed to completely clear the waters about CouchDB. Damien’s post together with the earlier post from Couchbase announcing the discontinuation of the Couchbase Single Server (Couchbase’s CouchDB distribution) were bringing closure to the CouchDB saga. And that was good.

I knew that the Apache CouchDB project and community are doing fine. Noah Slater’s email just confirmed that:

As some of you may have already read, Damien Katz, Apache CouchDB’s original developer, has publicly announced that he intends to focus his time exclusively on developing other products for his company. Damien has had very little involvement in the CouchDB project for a year or more now, so, for many people, this is confirmation of what they already knew. […]

Our biggest strength has always been the breadth and depth of our community of developers and users. In the very near future, we’ll be voting in a new committer, appointing a new PMC member, sprucing up the website, and making a major new release

Late last year, I also suggested that Cloudant would become the go to company for CouchDB. Adam Kocoloski’s post confirmed this too:

We, along with a host of other companies, strongly support the open source community in building CouchDB and we do not plan on stopping. We have been fortunate in our ability to attract outstanding engineers, investors, and customers. We intend to continue devoting resources to Apache CouchDB and offer our help in any way the community desires.

While I could understand some of the criticisms[1], my conclusion was pretty close to what Bradley Holt wrote:

Going forward, you’ll have two choices, either Apache CouchDB or Couchbase Server. The road map for Apache CouchDB will continue to be determined by community consensus. The road map for Couchbase Server will be determined by Couchbase, the company.

But I was left with a nagging feeling that I missed something. I kept on circling around a small part of the original post:

What’s the future of CouchDB? It’s Couchbase.

How could a product that is removing defining features (e.g. the HTTP RESTful API or the peer-to-peer replication), that is already different (Volker Mische’s post provides details), and that offers no clear migration path be the future of CouchDB?

The answer is actually simpler than I thought:

Couchbase is the future of CouchDB as CouchDB was the future of Lotus Notes. A new product that takes inspiration from the experience and lessons learned while building the previous one.

And that was a CouchDB season finale. I’m already looking forward to the next season’s plots.

Original title and link: CouchDB: A Season Finale (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)


Will Cloudant Become the CouchDB Go to Company?

I read that:

  • Cloudant might have raised $2.1 million (via Mass High Tech)
  • Cloudant has a new CEO in Derek Schoettle (previously VP Sales at Vertica Systems, Inc.) (via PR announcement)

After Membase and CouchOne merger, I think it was the general expectation that the new formed Couchbase will carry on CouchOne promise of being the commercial supporters and service company for CouchDB. This made sense considering Couchbase has been offering a CouchDB product: Couchbase Single Server.

On the other hand this situation created a lot of confusion in the CouchDB world and Couchbase offering. It was only one week ago that Couchbase finally came out to clear the waters: they are not and won’t be a support company for CouchDB , nor will they continue offering a CouchDB-only product.

So there’s an unfilled spot in the NoSQL world: a go to company when CouchDB services and support are needed. Truth is I don’t have enough data to decide if there’s also a need in the market for it though.

But I’m wondering if Cloudant will pursue this positioning. At least that’s how I read Cloudant ex-CEO Alan Hoffman words. Or will the change of CEO also mark a change of direction?

Original title and link: Will Cloudant Become the CouchDB Go to Company? (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)


CouchDB Saga: Cloudant and Couchbase

The CouchDB saga continues. Klint Finley, reporting now for ServicesAngle, tells the different perspectives that Couchbase (the company resulted from the merger of Membase and CouchOne) and Cloudant (makers of scalable BigCouch based on CouchDB) have about CouchDB.

Couchbase:

“We’re not the CouchDB company, we will never be the CouchDB company,” James Phillips, senior vice president of products at Couchbase, told me in an interview. Phillips explained that Couchbase is integrating replication and mobile technology from CouchDB into Membase Server (now known as Couchbase Server) but the company has no business interest in CouchDB (though some of its employees are still committed to the project).

Cloudant:

Cloudant CEO Alan Hoffman who told me that Cloudant is still committed to the Apache CouchDB project. “If you look at the commits, I think you’ll see that our employees are doing a lot of the heavy lifting,” […] Hoffman said that he believes the project is in good shape. “The passion is through the roof. We’re firmly behind the community,” he said.

One thing I can tell from where I stand: both are wrong.

Original title and link: CouchDB Saga: Cloudant and Couchbase (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://servicesangle.com/blog/2011/11/25/cloudant-ceo-were-still-committed-to-apache-couchdb/


Iris Couch: Your New Source for CouchDB Hosting

Today, we are proud to introduce Iris Couch, a Couchbase spin-off and your new one-stop shop for hosted CouchDB. We are transferring the Couchbase hosting business to Iris Couch – a company founded and operated by the former Couchbase hosting team – and Iris Couch will focus solely on providing the rock-solid hosting service you deserve.

Why?

We know you’re wondering “What does this mean for me and my couches?” Relax. The name is changing, but the platform is not. Same platform. Same service. Same team. You don’t even need to touch your existing couches…the transition to Iris Couch will be seamless for you.

What is the value proposition or differentiator of Iris Couch (let’s say compared to Cloudant)?

Original title and link: Iris Couch: Your New Source for CouchDB Hosting (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)


BigCouch Case Study: Research of Radition in Seattle

Cloudant’s BigCouch database let the team keep up with a steady flow of data so it could process and analyze it, then share it with the various stakeholders in near-real-time. The team was changing the data about 20 times per day and writing complex workflows to process it, two tasks that fall into BigCouch’s wheelhouse. The database has a built-in MapReduce engine to enable writing and processing the workflows, and it allows for secondary indices, which users can populate with new data from their MapReduce jobs and query very quickly.

This is the first case study I’m reading about BigCouch. But keep in mind that the project initiator is also the founder of Cloudant the company that created and open sourced BigCouch

Original title and link: BigCouch Case Study: Research of Radition in Seattle (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)

via: http://gigaom.com/cloud/how-nosql-is-helping-allay-seattles-radiation-fears/


Cloudant about Couchbase Announcement

Alan Hoffman of Cloudant, the CouchDB hosting providers and creators of the BigCouch scalable CouchDB solution:

I do want to take issue with one thing said in the press release for Couchbase. They say: “Couchbase becomes the only document database capable of safely storing your data whether stored on a single server, or spread across hundreds.”

Some of our customers have billions of documents stored safely on dozens of nodes in datacenters around the world. It’s too soon to say what Couchbase will become, but if you need a safe, scalable, and easy-to-use document storage platform, our technology already provides that today

I think I’ve heard something similar before.

As a side note, I don’t know if it’s only me, but I always think that PR announcements (nb: I’m referring to Couchbase’s PR formulation) make more bad than good. I don’t have an issue with a company stating they want to create the best product that features X and Y and Z. As a possible client, I couldn’t care less if the product is the first, the last, or the only. I only care about those features that really make it useful to my problems.

Original title and link: Cloudant about Couchbase Announcement (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)

via: http://blog.cloudant.com/some-thoughts-on-the-couchbase-announcement/


BigCouch: Java Map-Reduce with CouchDB

Feels like a conspiracy to have the 3rd Java related post today, but the one from Cloudant is quite big:

Today we are releasing the Java Language Map-Reduce View Interface for Cloudant’s Hosted CouchDB service. This interface defines the protocol for writing Map-Reduce views in Java that can be run on our hosted CouchDB platform. […] The Java view server works differently than a standard CouchDB view server. The design document does not contain code. Instead, the design document specifies which class should be called for the Map and Reduce steps. The code (a jar) is attached to the design document in the form of a binary attachment. This jar contains both user defined classes and external libraries that are needed. This paradigm (libraries as binary attachments) is a non-standard extension of the CouchDB view server API.

Bringing the most popular VM and all the languages supported on it to CouchDB is definitely a very smart move.

Original title and link for this post: BigCouch: Java Map-Reduce with CouchDB (published on the NoSQL blog: myNoSQL)

via: http://blog.cloudant.com/java-language-map-reduce-views