ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close

Nodeable: All content tagged as Nodeable in NoSQL databases and polyglot persistence

Overview of Dremel-Like Solutions: Moving Beyond Hadoop for Big Data Needs

Until I learn more about the recently announced Cloudera Impala and Druid from Metamarkets, this article by Jaikumar Vijayan should offer—with some inherent mistakes1—a good overview of the solutions aiming to offer alternatives to the batch-processing nature of Hadoop:

  • Google Dremel (BigQuery)
  • Cloudera Impala
  • Metamarkets Druid
  • Nodeable StreamReduce
  • SAP HANA integrated with Hadoop, etc.

  1. Just an example: “If you can stand latencies of a few seconds, Hadoop is fine. But Hadoop MapReduce is never going to be useful for sub-second latencies”. Then “The technology [nb Google Dremel] can run queries over trillion-row data tables in seconds…”

    Maybe just one more: consider the title “Moving beyond Hadoop” and then the quote from Google’s Ju-kay Kwek: “Google uses Dremel in conjuction with MapReduce. […] Hadoop and Dremel are distributed computing technologies, but each was built to address very different problems.” 

Original title and link: Overview of Dremel-Like Solutions: Moving Beyond Hadoop for Big Data Needs (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://www.infoworld.com/print/205879