MapR: All content tagged as MapR in NoSQL databases and polyglot persistence
Friday, 15 June 2012
Pricing for Hadoop Support: Cloudera, Hortonworks, MapR
Found the following bits in a post on The Register by Timothy Prickett Morgan:
While Cloudera and MapR are charging $4,000 per node for their enterprise-class Hadoop distributions (including their proprietary extensions and tech support), Hortonworks doesn’t have any proprietary extensions and is living off of the support contracts for the HDP 1.0 stack. […] Hortonworks is not providing its full list price, but for a starter ten-node cluster, you can get a standard support contract for $12,000 per year.
Hortonworks’s pricing looks a bit aggressive, but this could be explained by the fact that Hortonworks Data Platform 1.0 was made available only this week.
For running Hadoop in the cloud, there’s also Amazon Elastic MapReduce whose pricing was always clear. And Amazon has recently announced support for MapR Hadoop distribution on Elastic MapReduce.
Original title and link: Pricing for Hadoop Support: Cloudera, Hortonworks, MapR (©myNoSQL)
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Looking to Stay Ahead of Hortonworks and MapR in the Hadoop Market, Cloudera Delivers High Availability, Better Security, and Easier System Management
Compare the title, which is the subtitle of the InformationWeek post, with this paragraph which reflects the reality:
Both Cloudera and Hortonworks will be distributing open source software from Apache’s Hadoop 2.3 release, which includes upgrades aimed at high-availability and improved security. The release includes a hot-failover for the NameNode (metadata server) of the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), which has long been a single point of failure.
Cloudera is indeed one of the biggest Hadoop contributors and a company that have helped a lot proving and thus popularizing Hadoop through their packaging of open source Hadoop ecosystem components paired with their management tool (Cloudera Manager). But NameNode high availability and security improvements are part of the Apache Hadoop source code.
Original title and link: Looking to Stay Ahead of Hortonworks and MapR in the Hadoop Market, Cloudera Delivers High Availability, Better Security, and Easier System Management (©myNoSQL)
via: http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/info_management/240001574
Monday, 19 March 2012
Big Data Market Analysis: Vendors Revenue and Forecasts
I think this is the first extensive Big Data report I’m reading that includes enough relevant and quite exhaustive data about the majority of players in the Big Data market, plus some captivating forecasts.
As of early 2012, the Big Data market stands at just over $5 billion based on related software, hardware, and services revenue. Increased interest in and awareness of the power of Big Data and related analytic capabilities to gain competitive advantage and to improve operational efficiencies, coupled with developments in the technologies and services that make Big Data a practical reality, will result in a super-charged CAGR of 58% between now and 2017.

While there are many stories behind these numbers and many things to think about, here is what I’ve jotted down while studying the report:
- it’s no surprise that “megavendors” (IBM, HP, etc.) account for the largest part of today’s Big Data market revenue
- still, the revenue ratio of pure-players vs megavendors feels quite unbalanced: $311mil out of $5.1bil
- the pure-player category includes: Vertica, Aster Data, Splunk, Greenplum, 1010data, Cloudera, Think Big Analytics, MapR, Digital Reasoning, Datameer, Hortonworks, DataStax, HPCC Systems, Karmasphere
- there are a couple of names that position themselves in the Big Data market that do not show up in anywhere (e.g. 10gen, Couchbase)
- this could lead to the conclusion that the companies that include hardware in their offer benefit of larger revenues
- I’m wondering though what is the margin in the hardware market segment. While not having any data at hand, I think I’ve read reports about HP and Dell not doing so well due exactly to lower margins
- see bullet point further down about revenue by hardware, software, and services
- this could explain why so many companies are trying their hand at appliances
- by looking at the various numbers you can see that those selling appliances usually have a large corporation behind supporting the production costs for hadware and probably the cost of the sales force
- in the Big Data revenue by vendor you can find quite a few well-known names from the consulting segment
- the revenue by type pie lists services as accounting for 44%, hardware for 31%, and software for 13% which might give an idea of what makes up the megavendors’ sales packages
- most of the NoSQL database companies and Hadoop companies are mostly in the software and services segment
Great job done by the Wikibon team.
Original title and link: Big Data Market Analysis: Vendors Revenue and Forecasts (©myNoSQL)
via: http://wikibon.org/wiki/v/Big_Data_Market_Size_and_Vendor_Revenues
Monday, 5 March 2012
Hadoop Namenode High Availability Merged to HDFS Trunk
As I’m slowly recovering after a severe poisoning that I initially ignored but finally put me to bed for almost a week, I’m going to post some of the most interesting articles I’ve read while resting.
Hadoop Namenode’s single point of failure has always been mentioned as one of the weaknesses of Hadoop and also as a differentiator of other Hadoop-based commercial offerings. But now the Namenode HA branch was merged into trunk and while it will take a couple of cicles to complete the tests, this will become soon part of the Hadoop distribution.
Here’s Jitendra Pandey announcement on Hortonworks’s blog:
Significant enhancements were completed to make HOT Failover work:
- Configuration changes for HA
- Notion of active and standby states were added to the Namenode
- Client-side redirection
- Standby processing journal from Active
- Dual block reports to Active and Standby
In a follow up post to Gartner’s article Apache Hadoop 1.0 Doesn’t Clear Up Trunks and Branches Questions. Do Distributions?, the advantage of using custom distributions will slowly vanish and the open source version will be the one you’ll want to have in production.
Original title and link: Hadoop Namenode High Availability Merged to HDFS Trunk (©myNoSQL)
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
5 Top Misconceptions about Big Data and Hadoop
The MapR team analyzes the top 5 misconceptions in the Big Data/Hadoop market:
- Big Data is not simply about massive amounts of data — petabytes and beyond. Big Data represents a paradigm shift.
- Since Hadoop is a funny name and somewhat new to people they assume it must be risky.
- Another misconception about Hadoop, is that it is a batch process.
- Perhaps the biggest misconception is that Hadoop is a single, monolithic, component.
- With respect to open source, the question about a distribution is not a simple binary “open” or “closed”.
The first 4 points are indeed how things are seen from the outside.
While I do understand the nuance introduced by the last point—allowing to plug MapR—, things are black and white: it is either open source or not. But that’s just one dimension of the various components of the Hadoop stack. What really matters is how well a component integrates with the rest of the stack. The questions to be asked are: does it maintain the same interfaces? what’s the cost of replacing it? does it allow to use a 3rd party component? does it force me to get special components or hardware?
Original title and link: 5 Top Misconceptions about Big Data and Hadoop (©myNoSQL)
via: http://www.mapr.com/blog/top-misconceptions-about-big-data-and-hadoop
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
12 Hadoop Vendors to Watch in 2012
My list of 8 most interesting companies for the future of Hadoop didn’t try to include anyone having a product with the Hadoop word in it. But the list from InformationWeek does. To save you 15 clicks, here’s their list:
- Amazon Elastic MapReduce
- Cloudera
- Datameer
- EMC (with EMC Greenplum Unified Analytics Platform and EMC Data Computing Appliance)
- Hadapt
- Hortonworks
- IBM (InfoSphere BigInsights)
- Informatica (for HParser)
- Karmasphere
- MapR
- Microsoft
- Oracle
Original title and link: 12 Hadoop Vendors to Watch in 2012 (©myNoSQL)
Monday, 23 January 2012
MapR’s Map-Reduce Ready Disitributed File System Patent Filing
Here’s the abstract of the patent filing submitted by MapR’s for a Map-Reduce Ready Distributed File System:
A map-reduce compatible disitrubuted file system that consists of successive component layers that each provide the basis on which the next layer is built provides transactional read-write -update semantics with file chunk replication and huge file-create rates. A primitive storage layer (storage pools) knits together raw block stores and provides a storage mechanism for containers and transaction logs. Storage pools are manipulated by individual file servers. Containers provide the fundamental basis for data replication, relocation, and transactional updates. A container location database allows containers to be found among all file servers, as well as defining precedence among replicas of containers to organize transactional updates of container contents. Volumes facilitate control of data placement, creation of snapshots and mirrors, and retention of a variety of control and policy information. Key-value stores relate keys to data for such purposes as directories, container location maps, and offset maps in compressed files.
You can get the complete PDF from here.
Original title and link: MapR’s Map-Reduce Ready Disitributed File System Patent Filing (©myNoSQL)
Tuesday, 10 January 2012
Partnerships in the Hadoop Market
Just a quick recap:
- Cloudera: Oracle, Dell, NetApp
- Hortonworks: Microsoft
- MapR: EMC (integration with Greenplum HD)
Amazon doesn’t partner with anyone for their Amazon Elastic Map Reduce. And IBM is walking alone with the software-only InfoSphere BigInsights.
Original title and link: Partnerships in the Hadoop Market (©myNoSQL)
Thursday, 15 December 2011
8 Most Interesting Companies for Hadoop’s Future
Filtering and augmenting a Q&A on Quora:
- Cloudera: Hadoop distribution, Cloudera Enterprise, Services, Training
- Hortonworks: Apache Hadoop major contributions, Services, Training
- MapR: Hadoop distribution, Services, Training
- HPCC Systems: massive parallel-processing computing platform
- HStreaming: real-time data processing and analytics capabilities on top of Hadoop
- DataStax: DataStax Enterprise, Apache Cassandra based platform accepting real-time input from online applications, while offering analytic operations, powered by Hadoop
- Zettaset: Enterprise Data Analytics Suite built on Hadoop
- Hadapt: analytic platform based on Apache Hadoop and relational DBMS technology
I’ve left aside names like IBM, EMC, Informatica, which are doing a lot of integration work.
Original title and link: 8 Most Interesting Companies for Hadoop’s Future (©myNoSQL)
Monday, 12 December 2011
Hadoop Market Competition: comScore From Cloudera to MapR
Mike Brown (comScore CTO):
We could capitalize the purchase [of MapR] with an annual maintenance charge versus a yearly cost per node. NFS allowed our enterprise systems to easily access the data in the cluster.
Some interesting bits:
- comScore runs a 1000+ self-hosted Hadoop cluster
- comScore migrated from Cloudera to MapR in 2 days
- the migration was accomplished by copying and reloading data
- depending on the size of stored data, a better approach would a rolling migration—
- comScore MapR’s Direct Access NFS feature, which exposes Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) data as NFS files which can then be easily mounted, modified or overwritten
- comScore will continue to use Cloudera for training purposes
- Question: what is the advantage of paying two providers and maintaining two different clusters?
As previewed by Cloudera-Hortonworks exchanges, the competition on the Hadoop market is becoming fierce. But at least this story involves companies that are actively involved in innovating and improving Hadoop. Not those that just want to monetize it.
Original title and link: Hadoop Market Competition: comScore From Cloudera to MapR (©myNoSQL)
Hadoop, HPCC, MapR and the TeraSort Benchmark
HPCC Systems 4 nodes cluster sorts 100 gigabytes in 98 seconds and is 25% faster than a 20 nodes Hadoop cluster.
Results achieved in December 2011 show that an HPCC Systems four node Thor cluster took only 98 seconds to complete a Terasort with a job size of 100 gigabytes (GB) on a cluster five times smaller than Hadoop. The HPCC Systems four node cluster was comprised of one (1) Dell PowerEdge C6100 2U server with Intel® Xeon® processors E5675 series, 48GB of memory, and 6 x 146GB SAS HDD’s. The Dell C6100 houses four nodes inside the 2U enclosure. The previous leader ran the same Terasort benchmark in 130 seconds on a 20-node Hadoop cluster using equivalent node hardware. HPCC Systems is an Open Source, enterprise-proven Big Data analytics-processing platform.
Thus Armando Escalante (SVP and CTO of LexisNexis Risk Solutions and head of HPCC Systems) concludes:
These results demonstrate that HPCC Systems is a leader in Big Data processing
Now switching to a post on MapR’s blog:
Recently a world record was claimed for a Hadoop benchmark. […] We were surprised to see that this world record was for a TeraSort benchmark on a 100GB of data. TeraSort is a standard benchmark and the name is derived from “sorting a terabyte”. Any record claims for sorting a 100GB dataset across a 20 node cluster with 10 times as much memory is comical. The test is named TeraSort not GigaSort.
Original title and link: Hadoop, HPCC, MapR and the TeraSort Benchmark (©myNoSQL)
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
Hortonworks Data Platform: Hortonworks’ Hadoop Distribution
Announcement came out today[1]:
Hortonworks Data Platform, powered by Apache Hadoop — As we began to interact with enterprises and ecosystem partners, the one constant was the need for a base distribution of Apache Hadoop that is 100% open source and that contains the essential components used with every Hadoop installation. A distribution was needed to provide an easy to install, tightly integrated and well tested set of servers and tools. As we interacted with potential partners, we also heard the message loud and clear that they wanted open and secure APIs to easily integrate and extend Hadoop. We believe we have succeeded on both fronts. The Hortonworks Data Platform is such an open source distribution. It is powered by Apache Hadoop and includes the essential Hadoop components, plus some that make it more manageable, open and extensible. Our distribution is based on Hadoop 0.20.205, the first Apache Hadoop release that supports security and HBase. It also includes some new APIs, such as WebHDFS and those in Ambari and HCatalog, which will make it easy for our partners to integrate their products with Apache Hadoop. For those new to Ambari, it is an open source Apache project that will bring improved installation and management to Hadoop. HCatalog is a metadata management service for simplifying the sharing of data between Hadoop and other data systems. We are releasing Hortonworks Data Platform initially as a limited technology preview with plans to open it up to the public in early 2012.
The fight is on–even if for now the tone is still polite. And if we are adding to the mix MapR and LexisNexis’ HPCC, not to mention the armies of marketers and sales coming from Oracle, IBM, EMC, NetApp, etc. this actually smells like war.
Edward Ribeiro apty commented: “This reminds me of Linux distros war circa 2001”.
-
The emphasis in the text is mine to underline the most important aspects of the announcement. ↩
Original title and link: Hortonworks Data Platform: Hortonworks’ Hadoop Distribution (©myNoSQL)
Most Popular Articles
- Translate SQL to MongoDB MapReduce
- Tutorial: Getting Started With Cassandra
- CouchDB vs MongoDB: An attempt for a More Informed Comparison
- Cassandra @ Twitter: An Interview with Ryan King
- A Couple of Nice GUI Tools for MongoDB
- NoSQL benchmarks and performance evaluations
- Ehcache: Distributed Cache or NoSQL Store?
- Document Databases Compared: CouchDB, MongoDB, RavenDB
- Quick Review of Existing Graph Databases
- NoSQL Data Modeling