ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close

I/O: All content tagged as I/O in NoSQL databases and polyglot persistence

How long do disk drives last?

The Backblaze guys are looking at their service—an online backup service—in an attempt to come up with numbers about disk failures rates, life expectancy, and other such answers to questions that everyone running a decently sized service needs to estimate and plan for:

The short answer is: we don’t know yet, but it’s longer than you might guess.

backblaze-drivestats-3-lifecycles

✚ The numbers in the post are pretty encouraging. Not in terms of relying on the fact that drives don’t fail as often as you expect, but rather in terms of long term investment.

This is the sort of post you really want to save as reference. Combine the numbers with those from Google’s paper Failure trends in a large disk drive population (PDF)

Original title and link: How long do disk drives last? (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://blog.backblaze.com/2013/11/12/how-long-do-disk-drives-last/


Amazon EBS, SSD, and Rackspace IOPS Per Dollar

Staying on the subject of IOPS in the cloud, Jeff Darcy did some testing with GlusterFS against Amazon EBS, Amazon SSD, Storm on Demand SS, and Rackspace instance storage and computed for each IOPS/$:

  • Amazon EBS: 1000 IOPS (provisioned) for $225/month or 4.4 IOPS/$ (server not included)
  • Amazon SSD: 4300 IOPS for $4464/month or 1.0 IOPS/month (that’s pathetic)
  • Storm on Demand SSD: 5500 IOPS for $590/month or 9.3 IOPS/$
  • Rackspace instance storage: 3400 IOPS for $692/month (8GB instances) or 4.9 IOPS/$
  • Rackspace with 4x block storage per server: 9600 IOPS for $811/month or 11.8 IOPS/$ (hypothetical, assuming CPU or network don’t become bottlenecks)

Original title and link: Amazon EBS, SSD, and Rackspace IOPS Per Dollar (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://pl.atyp.us/wordpress/index.php/2012/10/rackspace-block-storage/


Benchmarking EC2 I/O: An Extensive Analysis by Scalyr

Way too much to be learned from this fantastic post.

EC2 I/O Performance

Original title and link: Benchmarking EC2 I/O: An Extensive Analysis by Scalyr (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://blog.scalyr.com/2012/10/16/a-systematic-look-at-ec2-io/


I/O Intensive Apps and Amazon Cloud Improvements: EBS Provisioned IOPS & Optimized Instance Types

James Hamilton puts in perspective the last two new I/O related features coming from Amazon: the high performance I/O EC2 instances and EBS provisioned IOPS together with EBS-optimized EC2 instances:

With the announcement today, EC2 customers now have access to two very high performance storage solutions. The first solution is the EC2 High I/O Instance type announced last week which delivers a direct attached, SSD-powered 100k IOIPS for $3.10/hour. In today’s announcement this direct attached storage solution is joined by a high-performance virtual storage solution. This new type of EBS storage allows the creation of striped storage volumes that can reliably delivery 10,000 to 20,000 IOPS across a dedicated virtual storage network.

I’ve already said it, but this confirms it once again that Amazon is addressing most of the complains of running I/O intensive applications on EC2 and EBS.

Original title and link: I/O Intensive Apps and Amazon Cloud Improvements: EBS Provisioned IOPS & Optimized Instance Types (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2012/08/01/EBSProvisionedIOPSOptimizedInstanceTypes.aspx


A Preview of Future Disk Drives

A new type of data storage technology, called phase-change memory, has proven capable of writing some types of data faster than conventional flash based storage. The tests used a hard drive based on prototype phase-change memory chips.

The key phrase throughout the article is “some types of data“. This sounds like a validation of what Jeff Darcy has written about SSD, RAM, and spinning disks.

Original title and link: A Preview of Future Disk Drives (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/37771/?p1=A1&a=f