NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter



Why Should Rubyists be Interested in NoSQL?

Jesse Wolgamott answers the question why should Rubyists be interested in NoSQL?

Once you reach the point in transaction system where the database is the scalability cause of your scalability problems, there’s no going back. You’ve taken the red pill. Table-based transaction databases are constrained by memory and there’s a hard maximum until your app crawls to a halt. The dream of true replication and easy sharding is built in.

Also: migrations just suck, even in Rails.

Interesting to note that Jesse’s talk is about MongoDB, CouchDB, RavenDB and Amazon SDB, the first 3 of them not being known for built-in scalability features. While that’s not to say they cannot scale — see for example scaling CouchDB — and while each of them has an attractive feature set, there are already other NoSQL databases that provide better and easier scalability: Cassandra, HBase, Riak, Project Voldemort.