NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter



Stream Processors, DBMS Persistence, and Trends of Memory Costs

Mike Hogan in a post about stream processors and the actual trends of DRAM costs:

Some might argue that the trend is their friend, because DRAM is getting cheaper. Well DRAM prices have dropped about 33% per year, until 2012 when they started flat-lining and actually increasing.


This can actually sustain my scenario about Teradata and Pivotal’s enterprise data warehouse market ascension compared to pure in-memory solutions.

Original title and link: Stream Processors, DBMS Persistence, and Trends of Memory Costs (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)