NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter



Biodiversity Indexing: Offline Processing With Hadoop, Hive, Sqoop, Oozie

The architecture for offline processing biodiversity based on Sqoop, Hadoop, Oozie, and Hive:

Hadoop Sqoop Oozie Hive Biodiversity Indexing

And its future:

Following this processing work, we expect to modify our crawling to harvest directly into HBase. The flexibility HBase offers will allow us to grow incrementally the richness of the terms indexed in the Portal, while integrating nicely into Hadoop based workflows. The addition of coprocessors to HBase is of particular interest to further reduce the latency involved in processing, by eliminating batch processing altogether.

Many companies working with large datasets have to deal with multiple systems and duplicate data between the online services and offline processors. While the infrastructure costs are going down, the costs of complexity are not. The HBase + Hadoop and Cassandra + Brisk combos are starting to address this problem.

Original title and link: Biodiversity Indexing: Offline Processing With Hadoop, Hive, Sqoop, Oozie (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)