NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter



Schema on Writes vs Schema on Reads - Apache Hadoop and Data Agility

Ofer Mendelevitch for Hortonworks blog:

Hadoop is different. A schema is not needed when you write data; instead the schema is applied when using the data for some application, thus the concept of “schema on read”.

Most often when speaking about Hadoop, people refer to costs (commodity servers), parallelism and scalability. I do not remember how many times I’ve written that the main difference between Hadoop and traditional data warehouses is in the agility it offers.

One Hadoop tagline could be: “collect data today. analyse it when and how you want“.

Original title and link: Schema on Writes vs Schema on Reads - Apache Hadoop and Data Agility (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)