ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close
Wednesday, 23 January 2013
‹ Back

Cassandra Performance in Review

About:
,
,
,
,

Jonathan Ellis:

I honestly think Cassandra is one to two years ahead of the competition, but I’m under no illusions that Cassandra itself is perfect.

You cannot start the year without taking a stab at your competitors. At least from the performance point of view and even if they’re not really competitors—MongoDB, Riak, HBase.

The NoSQL market is ant-size compared to the database market and while easier to convince people to change from NoSQL to NoSQL, the products that will thrive are those that will be able to constantly convert people from outside of this small universe.

Original title and link: Cassandra Performance in Review (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/2012-in-review-performance