ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close

Simple Ruby Workers with MongoDB and Resque

After some research, we decided to use resque from github, but to adapt it to use mongodb instead of redis. The advantage here is that we already have a significant investment in mongodb, so we would not be introducing a new type of server to our infrastructure. Mongodb also has some features that redis does not, and we used those to build some interesting new features into resque.

After reading the post, I couldn’t identify those additional MongoDB features mentioned above. But I do agree you shouldn’t bring in new infrastructure requirements with every new tools you are using. Very heterogeneous platforms are difficult and expensive to maintain.

Original title and link: Simple Ruby Workers with MongoDB and Resque (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)

via: http://blog.igodigital.com/blog/on-recommendations/simple-ruby-workers-with-mongodb-and-resque