ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close
Thursday, 26 July 2012
‹ Back

Defending Hadoop’s HDFS - Hortonworks Version

About:
,
,
,
,

In reply to the attack to HDFS, Eric Baldeschwieler emphasizes the pros of HDFS:

  • Extreme low cost per byte
  • Very high bandwidth to support MapReduce workloads
  • Data reliability

but also the state of the HDFS competition:

  • not designed for Hadoop scale
  • not using commodity hardware or open source software
  • not meant for MapReduce
  • unproven technology

Original title and link: Defending Hadoop’s HDFS - Hortonworks Version (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://hortonworks.com/blog/thinking-about-the-hdfs-vs-other-storage-technologies/