NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter



MySQL Is Bazillion Times Faster Than MemSQL

Domas Mituzas about the MemSQL vs MySQL benchmark:

Though I usually understand that those claims don’t make any sense, I was wondering what did they do wrong. Apparently they got MySQL with default settings running and MemSQL with default settings running, then compared the two. They say it is a good benchmark, as it compares what users get just by installing standard packages.

That is already cheating, because systems are forced to work in completely different profiles.

The first paragraph of the post summarizes very well the general feeling about benchmarks:

I don’t like stupid benchmarks, as they waste my time.

I think that most of the generic benchmarks are stupid, even if some generic numbers are considered interesting by software engineers. Benchmarks designed around specific scenarios of applications will most of the time give more realistic results. But even those are difficult to design and account for all the configuration options, scaling, or changes of the use cases.

Original title and link: MySQL Is Bazillion Times Faster Than MemSQL (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)