ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Membase Amazon SimpleDB MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close
Friday, 31 December 2010
‹ Back

NoSQL Comparison: Cassandra, CouchDB, HBase, MongoDB, Redis, Riak

About:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Just before the end of year, a brief comparison — bullet style — of Cassandra, CouchDB, HBase, MongoDB, Redis, and Riak:

But the differences between “NoSQL” databases are much bigger than it ever was between one SQL database and another. This means that it is a bigger responsibility on software architects to choose the appropriate one for a project right at the beginning.

Original title and link: NoSQL Comparison: Cassandra, CouchDB, HBase, MongoDB, Redis, Riak (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)

via: http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis

Find more articles on the same topics: