ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close
Monday, 12 March 2012
‹ Back

Is Memcached a Dinosaur in Comparison to Redis?

About:
,
,

Interesting comments on StackOverflow:

So, honestly - Is memcache really that old dinousaur that is a bad choice from a performance perspective when compared to this newcomer called Redis?

Here’s mine: feature-wise Redis has already overpasssed Memcached in almost all aspects. Redis 3.0 will bring Redis Cluster a distributed implementation of a subset of Redis standalone—check this for an detailed explanation of Redis Cluster. Production-wise though, Memcached will not be replaced so easy as so many services rely on it for quite some time.

Original title and link: Is Memcached a Dinosaur in Comparison to Redis? (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

via: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2873249/is-memcached-a-dinosaur-in-comparison-to-redis