ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close
Thursday, 21 October 2010
‹ Back

A Comparison of a Graph Database and a Relational Database

About:
,
,
,
,

A paper comparing MySQL and Neo4j coming from the Dept. of Computer and Information Science of University of Mississippi:

The evaluation methodology designed to compare MySQL and Neo4j involves objective benchmarks and subjective com- parisons based on system documentation and experience. The objective tests include processing speed based on a pre- defined set of queries, disk space requirements, and scalabil- ity. Subjective tests include maturity/level of support, ease of programming, flexibility, and security.

I’ve seen a MySQL and Neo4j benchmark before.

Original title and link: A Comparison of a Graph Database and a Relational Database (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)

via: http://cs.olemiss.edu/~ychen/publications/conference/vicknair_acmse10.pdf