ALL COVERED TOPICS

NoSQL Benchmarks NoSQL use cases NoSQL Videos NoSQL Hybrid Solutions NoSQL Presentations Big Data Hadoop MapReduce Pig Hive Flume Oozie Sqoop HDFS ZooKeeper Cascading Cascalog BigTable Cassandra HBase Hypertable Couchbase CouchDB MongoDB OrientDB RavenDB Jackrabbit Terrastore Amazon DynamoDB Redis Riak Project Voldemort Tokyo Cabinet Kyoto Cabinet memcached Amazon SimpleDB Datomic MemcacheDB M/DB GT.M Amazon Dynamo Dynomite Mnesia Yahoo! PNUTS/Sherpa Neo4j InfoGrid Sones GraphDB InfiniteGraph AllegroGraph MarkLogic Clustrix CouchDB Case Studies MongoDB Case Studies NoSQL at Adobe NoSQL at Facebook NoSQL at Twitter

NAVIGATE MAIN CATEGORIES

Close

MongoDB: Java Frameworks Compared

Knut Haugen takes a look at MongoDB Java Driver, Morphia, and Mungbean:

It’s Mungbean, by a nose! Mainly because of the cleaner domain objects and the DSL. There is more code involved but I found it to be more elegant than the other approaches. I want to note that both morphia and mungbean are not immensely mature and done by any definition of the word and that has to come into consideration when using them. And it may be that a wordy statically typed language like Java has a bit of friction with a very dynamic database backend like MongoDB. I don’t know, but I’ll be looking into ruby drivers in the future and we’ll see.

The other libraries — GuiceyData, Sculptor, Morphia, but also the MongoDB Java driver — are compared in MongoDB in Java.

Original title and link for this post: MongoDB: Java Frameworks Compared (published on the NoSQL blog: myNoSQL)

via: http://blog.knuthaugen.no/2010/07/comparing-mongodb-java-frameworks.html